Utah DUIs, Face Book, and My Space

A friend of mine, an attorney, told me about a case where he went to sentencing with his client.  The friend argued to the judge that his client is not a party animal and that this was a one time mistake.  When he was done, the prosecutor stood up with printed photos from the client's myspace account.  Needless to say, the photos did not depict a man kneeling and praying at church (although he was kneeling with large cups of beer in his hand.

My point is this:
  • Take your myspace and facebook pages down.
  • If you can't do that, tone your pages down.
  • Most of all, confessing your sins on these pages is just as good as a signed confession to convict you.
Here is a story my friend sent me on this very issue entitled Don't drink and drive, then post on Facebook.

This is is a quote "If it shows up under your name you own it," he said, "and you better understand that people look for that stuff."
Don't drink and drive, then post on Facebook
Photos on social networking sites come back to bite defendants

Anonymous / AP file
The photo of Joshua Lipton at a Halloween party (discovered on Facebook) was taken two weeks after Lipton was charged in a drunk driving car crash that seriously injured a woman.
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Two weeks after Joshua Lipton was charged in a drunken driving crash that seriously injured a woman, the 20-year-old college junior attended a Halloween party dressed as a prisoner. Pictures from the party showed him in a black-and-white striped shirt and an orange jumpsuit labeled "Jail Bird."

In the age of the Internet, it might not be hard to guess what happened to those pictures: Someone posted them on the social networking site Facebook. And that offered remarkable evidence for Jay Sullivan, the prosecutor handling Lipton's drunken-driving case.

Sullivan used the pictures to paint Lipton as an unrepentant partier who lived it up while his victim recovered in the hospital. A judge agreed, calling the pictures depraved when sentencing Lipton to two years in prison.

Online hangouts like Facebook and MySpace have offered crime-solving help to detectives and become a resource for employers vetting job applicants. Now the sites are proving fruitful for prosecutors, who have used damaging Internet photos of defendants to cast doubt on their character during sentencing hearings and argue for harsher punishment.

"Social networking sites are just another way that people say things or do things that come back and haunt them," said Phil Malone, director of the cyberlaw clinic at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society. "The things that people say online or leave online are pretty permanent."

The pictures, when shown at sentencing, not only embarrass defendants but also can make it harder for them to convince a judge that they're remorseful or that their drunken behavior was an aberration. (Of course, the sites are also valuable for defense lawyers looking to dig up dirt to undercut the credibility of a star prosecution witness.)

Prosecutors do not appear to be scouring networking sites while preparing for every sentencing, even though telling photos of criminal defendants are sometimes available in plain sight and accessible under a person's real name. But in cases where they've had reason to suspect incriminating pictures online, or have been tipped off to a particular person's MySpace or Facebook page, the sites have yielded critical character evidence.

"It's not possible to do it in every case," said Darryl Perlin, a senior prosecutor in Santa Barbara County, Calif. "But certain cases, it does become relevant."

Perlin said he was willing to recommend probation for Lara Buys for a drunken driving crash that killed her passenger last year — until he thought to check her MySpace page while preparing for sentencing.

The page featured photos of Buys — taken after the crash but before sentencing — holding a glass of wine as well as joking comments about drinking. Perlin used the photos to argue for a jail sentence instead of probation, and Buys, then 22, got two years in prison.

"Pending sentencing, you should be going to (Alcoholics Anonymous), you should be in therapy, you should be in a program to learn to deal with drinking and driving," Perlin said. "She was doing nothing other than having a good old time."

Santa Barbara defense lawyer Steve Balash said the day he met his client Jessica Binkerd, a recent college graduate charged with a fatal drunken driving crash, he asked if she had a MySpace page. When she said yes, he told her to take it down because he figured it might have pictures that cast her in a bad light.

But she didn't remove the page. And right before Binkerd was sentenced in January 2007, the attorney said he was "blindsided" by a presentencing report from prosecutors that featured photos posted on MySpace after the crash.

One showed Binkerd holding a beer bottle. Others had her wearing a shirt advertising tequila and a belt bearing plastic shot glasses.

Binkerd wasn't doing anything illegal, but Balash said the photos hurt her anyway. She was given more than five years in prison, though the sentence was later shortened for unrelated reasons.

"When you take those pictures like that, it's a hell of an impact," he said.

Rhode Island prosecutors say Lipton was drunk and speeding near his school, Bryant University in Smithfield, in October 2006 when he triggered a three-car collision that left 20-year-old Jade Combies hospitalized for weeks.

Sullivan, the prosecutor, said another victim of the crash gave him copies of photographs from Lipton's Facebook page that were posted after the collision. Sullivan assembled the pictures — which were posted by someone else but accessible on Lipton's page — into a PowerPoint presentation at sentencing.

One image shows a smiling Lipton at the Halloween party, clutching cans of the energy drink Red Bull with his arm draped around a young woman in a sorority T-shirt. Above it, Sullivan rhetorically wrote, "Remorseful?"

Superior Court Judge Daniel Procaccini said the prosecutor's slide show influenced his decision to sentence Lipton.

"I did feel that gave me some indication of how that young man was feeling a short time after a near-fatal accident, that he thought it was appropriate to joke and mock about the possibility of going to prison," the judge said in an interview.


"The pictures showed a kid who didn't know what to do two weeks after this accident," Bristow said, adding that Lipton wrote apologetic letters to the victim and her family and was so upset that he left college. "He didn't know how to react."

Still, he uses the incident as an example to his own teenage children to watch what they post online.

"If it shows up under your name you own it," he said, "and you better understand that people look for that stuff."



Utah ranks as one of the "best" in low percentage of drunk-related deaths!

Here is an article about South Carolina, which ranks as one of the worst for percentages of drunk-related deaths.  However, Utah ranks as one of the best in the nation.

The article states:

--In the U.S., someone is killed in an alcohol-related accident about every 30 minutes.

--Roughly one-third of all drivers arrested or convicted of driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol are repeat offenders.

--There were 13,470 drunk-driving traffic deaths last year in the U.S.

Some of the other "worst" states in percentage of fatalities involving a drunk driver: Montana, Hawaii, Texas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Connecticut and South Dakota.

These states are reported as the "best" in low percentage of drunk-related deaths: Utah, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Carolina, Alaska, Maine, New York, Georgia, Indiana and Iowa.

The author jumps on the bandwagon with MADD to get even more tougher on DUIs.  The author believes that jail time is a threat.  Most of the people I deal with do not intend to drive drunk.  They seem to lose their rational thinking at some point during the evening.  Calling on the powers of deterrence just doesn't seem to work.  In the previous post I did, I like the solutions suggested by the Janice.  It's too easy to gripe and complain.  It's too easy to jump on the band wagon of "let's get tough of DUIs.  Imprisoning people has never worked.  Look for other solutions.  Make car manufacturer's develop cars that won't start if alcohol is on your breath.  Provide other ways for a person to get home.  Just some things to consider. DUI deaths: S.C. ranks 2nd worst
Saturday, December 8, 2007


This columnist takes great pride in reporting positive news about this great state. Conversely, it takes a great amount of thought to introduce a subject in which the state does not excel.

In this context, it is distressing to report that the Mothers Against Drunk Driving organization just released a study that shows South Carolina as the second worst state in the nation in a ranking based on the percent of total traffic fatalities that involve a drunk driver. Only the state of Wisconsin ranks worse.

Of 50 states plus the District of Columbia studied, our state ranks No. 50. Is it time for action? Please read on.

Specifically, the MADD report shows that 40.5 percent of South Carolina's highway deaths in 2006 involved a drunk driver. That figure is based on 1,037 traffic crash deaths last year, with 420 alcohol-related.

MADD states in a letter to this citizen: "Charleston's roads are a potential death trap for you and your family! Part of this is because South Carolina's drunk-driving law has a number of loopholes in it, which allows for many driving offenders to be let off."

The thrust of MADD'S campaign is for the General Assembly to pass legislation to eradicate repeat-

offender violations, injuries and deaths through the mandatory use of ignition interlocks. With this device, a sensor perceives when a drunk is about to start the vehicle and locks the ignition.

In addition to the MADD initiative, your columnist has additional ideas that also could drastically reduce highway fatalities caused by DUI. Candidly, this state is not tough enough on first, second, third and even fourth offenders. Look at these statistics, published some time ago by The State newspaper:

--In a given month, 176 people were serving time for killing someone in a drunken-driving accident. Almost 18 percent of those people had at least one prior DUI conviction in South Carolina.

--On average, 40 percent of repeat-offense DUI cases from 2002 through 2006 involved guilty pleas to reduced charges.

--Just 826 of 6,500 sentences given out to repeat offenders during that time included prison time.

The newspaper also reported a statement from a chief prosecutor for Orangeburg, Calhoun and Dorchester Counties, David Pascoe: "Can you imagine if you tried every DUI case? You wouldn't move any other cases."

Another chief prosecutor for the 15th circuit, Greg Hembree, said judges, too, are under pressure to accept pleas. "Judges are catching it all the time, that the prisons already are full, and they need to save bed spaces for the violent offenders. If you're going to look at blame, I think it can be spread around pretty broadly."

DUI prison

That last point is especially significant if you recall the recent Post and Courier series on overcrowded jails. Here is one Spaulding Solution (SS): To overcome the reluctance of prosecutors and judges to sentence first-time DUI offenders to crowded jails and to keep them from violent criminals, build another jail for those convicted of DUI.

The SS Plan consists of a motel-type high-rise building that would be surrounded by a wire fence.

It would be known as a jail. There would be four beds to a room, no TV, no phones of any kind, with austere but clean conditions. The stigma of going to jail would help responsible citizens avoid driving while under the influence and use a designated driver or a taxi cab. A first-time DUI sentence would be three days in jail; second offense, seven to 10 days, etc.

Can you imagine the reaction of family members having to admit, "Daddy's (or Mommy's) in jail!"

Are mandatory jail terms a threat? Yes.

Your comments would be appreciated. Write: 2 Wharfside St., 2A, Charleston, SC 29401. At the same time, keep in mind these sobering facts:

--In the U.S., someone is killed in an alcohol-related accident about every 30 minutes.

--Roughly one-third of all drivers arrested or convicted of driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol are repeat offenders.

--There were 13,470 drunk-driving traffic deaths last year in the U.S.

Some of the other "worst" states in percentage of fatalities involving a drunk driver: Montana, Hawaii, Texas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Connecticut and South Dakota.

These states are reported as the "best" in low percentage of drunk-related deaths: Utah, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Carolina, Alaska, Maine, New York, Georgia, Indiana and Iowa.

George Spaulding is a retired General Motors executive and distinguished executive-in-residence emeritus at the School of Business and Economics at the College of Charleston.